Privacy policies:
“By using this website or any of our services, any user (“user” or “you”) agrees to abide and be bound by the current terms contained herein, which constitute a valid and binding agreement between you and the Foundation for Intentional Community (“FIC” or “we”). To avoid all doubt, use of our website or any of our services creates a contractual agreement between FIC and you. By using our website or any of our services, you are accepting this agreement in its then-current form at the time of use and your agreement to its terms is implied. If you do not agree to these terms, you may not use our website or any related services.”
-As their terms/conditions/policies update; inherently your agreement to & contract of uphold.
“Any information that you disclose publicly becomes public information and you should exercise caution when deciding to disclose Personal Data in the content you provide. You agree to hold FIC harmless for any damages related to Personal Data you publicly disclosed, either on our website or otherwise.”
-“Sensitive data refers to data that includes”, yet noth limited to, “details
about your race or ethnicity, religious or philosophical beliefs, sex life, sexual orientation, political opinions or affiliations, information about your health, or information about criminal convictions and offences.” [As redundant,] includes HIPAA, real[full] names, age, location, real names of families, how many & who yi live with, where you’re going (posts in this realm of desired locations hath proper (in certain writ[ten] forms) exemptions), etc…
Any [PI]I yi publicly post, yi risk anyone abusing your informations. Though, as a provider of these/this realm[s], FIC doth hath responsibilities to help protect us & hold us accountable; as anybody else; obviousies of their business statusies/statuses. This also means yi can’t hold them responsible for yi posting your (or another’s) information & any abusing it. If yi share your information more privately (with another in a pm, or with FIC) & somebody else abuses it, then FIC would needeth be[th] alerted ( if noth already executed), they’d execute an investigation with[out] authorities - authorities obviousies.
“If we suspect a personal data breach, we will notify you and any applicable regulator where we are legally required to do so.”
-Includes posting PII in forums &/or about your personal profile. If noth agree, arguments aren’t sagacious.
Terms & conditions:
“You agree that by registering, accessing, or using our services, you are agreeing to enter into a legally binding contract”
-Refraining redundancy.
“Governing Law and Jurisdiction
These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Washington without reference to its choice or conflicts of law principles. In cases where the “Dispute Resolution” section provided does not apply to you, you consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of federal and state courts in Seattle, Washington.”
-Regardless this wording; they might beth restricted to filings in Wa state; otherwise parameters allow them to file in your state by way of jurisdiction identifications. The policies/regulations/laws, if noth matches their realms, your state’s policies/regulations/laws take precedent. In digital realms, multiple versions are mixed regardless of origination. It alao needeth knoweth if any be of military veteran, if filed against, the Patriot Act allows yi to change jurisdiction to your [either] current location or residential.
“User Profiles and Conduct
When using this website or our services you are solely responsible for all content or data that you upload, post, email, or otherwise use.”
-The redundancy of businesses claiming they noth ado with accountability of their communities; they provideth protections services, yet any illegal interactions yi commet, or committed against, they’re noth responsible for reporting nor your care/safety - their policies are upholdable of them as they are the communities provided for. If to hath this contradictory, why? Feeling any illegal setup/test/trap/expectations/requirements - refraining & allowing the question to beth of own.
“FIC has no liability or responsibility for those interactions or any conflict or dispute that might occur as a result”
-Yi hath control of your own actions; refraining whence other conversations about the forums - with[out] theories. Refraining redundancies. How yi treat any is how yi advertise to beth treated. Jides/bullying/disrespectful or malicious teasing, however reprimanding or otherwise condoning unnecessary conformity is telling others it beth ok to treat yi like such.
“We do not monitor interactions between you and other members as a matter of course and have no obligation to do so.”
-With their interactions & open door policies, thus a contradiction. They too are members of these communities, regardless of however a hub (a hub can be a type of community). They respondeth, therefore they observeth. It’s an obligation to hold accountable; monitoring/observing interactions is everybody’s business - public interactions get public responses; how yi behave in public is/determines how public interacts.
“We do however reserve the right to do so if we wish.”
-If they wish noth to be held accountable, they needeth change natural laws - it’ll take longer than our physical realms.
“You agree that all content or data and interactions with other users must not”
-Be of dusrespect/malice (to others/self) - paraphrased list.
“FIC reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate action against anyone who violates these Terms”
-Noth excluding any of their employees, regardless of echelon level, nor status.
“including but not limited to, removing the offending content from our services,”
-Allowing for to reword text would likely beth part. Files would likely require them to scrub the servers; hopefully they’re noth wasting money on pay for programs when their servers are likely Unix/Linux - there’s just as reliable open source/freeware softwares.
